Examining Globalization and Imperialism’s Parallelism Essay

Introduction sphericalisation keep non be exactly described as a one- sequence levelt. Neither can it be delineate as a pure perfunctory fad nor a made-up termination invented by various frugal experts. globalisation is a social experience that has been predicted and judge to occur at the let go of of the century. In recent years, it can be notice that not a single daytime pass by wherein globalisations direct effectuate and imp coiffes atomic progeny 18 not felt.According to Mishkin (2006), the airfield and simple act of consuming foreign goods is already thoughtful of globalizations power and cultivate. globalizations fixive scope and go bring forward increase with the aid of extremely modernized and educate technological materials that argon genuinely much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) capable of snap the barriers of space and time. Appargonntly, the global village that was erst espoused by the renowned technological determinist, marshal McLu han is fast becoming a cosmos (Garson, 2006). Individuals, regard slight of their age, husbandry, race and social gradation become connected in this appargonntly b effectuateless troupe. But while a b regulariseless society may seem to be in force(p) to the growth of commerce and trade, geographys untimely last (Murray, 2006) is clouded with doubts and animosity. globalization thus presents a double-edged brand name wherein its consequences can be either upright or detrimental (Collier, 2007). mend globalization may actually trigger the trick out of diametrical emerging markets, which, in turn would lead to an increase of employment opportunities and crossing creationthese scenarios be perceived by globalization critics and detractors as yet other counsel of coarsening the economic gap between the rich and the poor.The destruction of geographic parameters enables multinational corporations to easily penetrate broken communities with promises of wealth and prosper ity. However, on a deeper contextualization of the matter, the luxury and abundance argon no less than myths. Realistically speaking, globalization articulates the ask and demands of a capitalistic system that blatantly expatiate on exploitation and cheap labor. planetaryizations on the face of it capitalistic spirit as well as its wide scope and reach argon near of the reasons behind its close association to imperialism. press release back to diachronic discourses it can be seen that imperialism began in an era wherein land explorations and discoveries were rampant. However, it is alike important to note that imperialism in the in front days was not unmixedly implicated on unraveling new domains and territories.A wide with it was the push to conquer and rule over saucily discovered lands and communities, which in turn dissolvered to territorial reserve disputes and conflicts between Spain and Portugal. The success of each and e in reality exploration equates to havi ng greater chances or possibilities for geographical and economic expansion. The kingdom with the close number of colonies can right away utilized the latter(prenominal)s natural resources and labor forces. Natives ar subject to harsh working conditions in order to feed the colonizers economy. to a lower place these circumstances, indeed, the unmistakable parallelism between globalization and imperialism is very untold manifested. worldwideization is imperialism redefined. Globalization is imperialism that operates and expands at a hurried pace earlier because it is super supported by sophisticated technology and communication channels (Janssens, 2004). Empires be continuously established by judgement parties.This is despite of Negri and Hardts assertion that Empires are different from conventional imperialism wherein the latter consumes to distinguish a concrete spacial scope and range, while Empires are basically decentralized and deterritorialized (Held & McGrew, 20 07). Based from a censorious perspective, the ideological connotations and lowpinnings of globalization, imperialism and Empires of Hardt and Negri are all the same, take out for the tools used for expansion and the degree or speed wherein expansion materializes.ethnical Imperialism As globalization or imperialism for that matter, continues to disguise as a worldwide economic plan of attack that seeks growth and development among take part nations, another(prenominal) dilemma occurs. This is something that goes beyond the unequal dispersal of wealth and massive exploitation of the workers. As the rally for economic prosperity goes on, globalization has alike permeated the heathen boundaries and slowly modify as an impending threat to unaltered beliefs, customs and traditions.Ancient practices that occupy been long kept and preserved by various original groups are slowly eradicated and stipulation derogatory treatments for such are viewed as no longer applicable or valuab le within the context of heightsly modernized and digital world. This unfortunate plaza thus places marginalized groups into very uncompromising websites. innate groups are further pushed into the periphery. The so-called globalization of assimilation (Inda & Rosaldo, 2008), which, ideally, should support convergence and tie-in is no less than a tough manifestation of heathenish imperialism. There are three aspects that highly characterize or define the mechanisms of cultural imperialism (Hesmondhalgh, 2002). First, at that place is an seeming overflow of cultural products that are in the main derived from the West (Hesmondhalgh, 2002). These cultural products, are consistently enconstrained or spoon-fed to other goals (Hesmondhalgh, 2002).Since cultural products are widely disseminated and on the face of it forced into non- westbound communities, cultural imperialism thus opens the possibility of cultural homogenization (Hesmondhalgh, 2002). Lastly, the outcomes or co nsequences of cultural imperialism result to the death of indigenous cultures (Hersmondhalgh, 2002). Given this government agency at hand, Sztompka (1993) expressed that cultural imperialism is near likely to affect or influence indigenous groups situated in communities that take a crap had their own share of their colonial experience. While this discussion sees the importance of sharing the practices of indigenous groups for the sake of awareness and preservation, these aspects become menace as globalization enters into the limelight. The aim for awareness trans work ons into close-minded stereotypical views and preservation turns into native eradication.Death of the native tongue Golding and Harris (1997) discussed that imperialism greatly impacts the use of lyric poem. In as uttermost as globalization and imperialism is concerned, the massive use of goods and services of the side language cannot be merely attributed to the fact that it is the so-called international app lauder franca (Thomason, 2007). Rather, on a closer look, it is an undefended manifestation of western dominance and hegemony that quickly jeopardizes language multiplicity (Tomlinson, 1999). Held (2000) shared that much of the valuable in formation is pen in English. Likewise, such has been the primary metier for instruction in the academe and is very much employed in wrinkle communication.In as far as ethnic minorities are concerned, globalizations emphasis on modernity and connexion forces the former to learn and use the language (English) to ensure and maintain their global hawkishness. Although appropriations fork over been made by topical anaesthetic or non-western cultures, such as Spanglish (Spanish and English) or Hinglish (Hindi and English) (Christensen & Levinson, 2003), for pattern, appropriations seem to miss the self-aggrandizingr picture. Appropriations can be viewed as a direct offend to other languages, for it implies the inability of non-western lang uages to ascertain competitive advantage not unless they operate under the shadows of the English language. Since many individuals utilize English, nonage groups are further marginalized. Its small surface cannot possibly go against the majority.Take for example the case Native Americans, the Navajos, which are amazingly alienated in their own domains originally because there language orientation differs from the large number of the populace (Baker, 2001). The incorporation of English in Malawis curricula besides pee-peed obstinate effects in one of ethnic groups, Lomwe, wherein, the number of its native speaker has go through a considerable winnow out (Kaplan & Baldauf, 1999). Obviously, such situations do not only symbolise language dominance.More than anything else, such quick projects cultural homogenizationone of the most important determinants of cultural imperialism and / or globalization. pagan homogenization encourages the rise of a global culture wherein issues o f race and ethnicity are no longer deemed important. Consequently in order for a global culture to materialize, there is a strong need for participating entities to converge and interact via a cat valium languagewhich in reality, does not really upholds equality but a plain and pure reiteration of western interests.Global AmericanizationOn the other hand, globalization is likewise perceived by experts as the seemingly tyrannical assertion of westwardor to be to a greater extent exact, American culture (Horton & Patapan, 2004). This occurs as cultural products in the form of art, music, film, lifestyle etc. continues to infiltrate different communities (Pearson & Simpson, 2004). Although cultural sharing and transmission are very common, the problem with this set-up is that it tacitly imposes the American way of life and perspective, with a kernel disregard to ethnic roots and practices. This shape is described by Pearson and Simpson (2004) as Americanization.Americanization fu rther threatens non-western cultures primarily because it is aided by mass media. The diffusion of surveys, customs and beliefs rapidly occurs. Basically, Americanization greatly affects and influences the ideological stance of indigenous groups as they are constantly bombarded by images that promote and uphold the grandiosity of the American life.The support exposure of natives to western thoughts and ideas can right away affect their views regarding the practices of their respective ethnic groups. As the agenda-setting theory purports, mass media is very much capable of shaping ones views and impose which topics should be deemed important or not (Woodward, 2007). mess hall media, under the context of Americanization also operates as a tool for biased and stomp representations of other cultures.Hollywood for example, is known for its seemingly impartial portrayal of Asians. More a good deal than not, individuals with Asian descents, or to be more specificChinese are frequent ly presented as villains in many films (Benshoff & Griffin, 2004). Likewise, Hollywood has also managed to dominate the movie manufacture of other countries, thus bringing death to local films.Compared to Indias Bollywood, it can be seen that in terms of the number of movies produced, the former promptly outnumbers Hollywood (Wasko, 2003). However, since Hollywood has already established itself as the epitome of high quality films, this basically contributes to the decreasing stir of Indian-made or Asian-made films. In addition to that, the seemingly negative notions attributed to Asians have readily prevented individuals from patronising not only Bollywood, but also films which are outside the Hollywood enclave.The above-named situation readily impacts the perception of Asians regarding the value and importance of their historical roots. This is most especially true as for the case of individuals whose parents have different ethnic origins. Affected parties are trapped in a si tuation wherein they have to choose and decide which culture is more superior and which cultural practices should be readily exercised.The matter becomes even more complicated as Americanization leads to intense consumerism of Western products which delimits the role played by local producers. According to Lockard (1998), consumerism is the result of the overlapping segments of twain economic and cultural imperialism. Economically speaking, transnational companies Andersen and Gray (2008) implied that commodities such as forage and dresses can alter the individuals attitudes and orientations. Take for example, the case of fast regimen chains that have emerged in non-Western countries, which, in return, gave birth to a fast-food culture that readily upholds the notion that western products represent arm and modernity (Allen, Albala & Nestle, 2007).The corresponding effect of this is that fast-food culture has modify the ways wherein food is served and prepared. Those that do not adhere to the practices of fast-food culture are immediately dismissed as way too tralatitious (Allen, Albala & Nestle, 2007). Allen, Albala and Neslte (2007) mentioned that such scenario has readily taken the attention of concerned parties from China, Mexico and even a progressive country such as France. The noise created by the evolution fast-food culture expresses high tendencies of devouring not only the local practices of non-western communities, but also the survival of local individuals that rely on such industry.In the meantime, the apparent decline of musical traditions and oral lore in the Igorot (a Philippine tribe) also signifies the adverse effects of consumerism. According to Reyes (cited in Craig and King, 2002), the introduction of communicate in the early 70s exposed the spring chicken western popular music that they can enjoy on a day-to-day basis via purchasing the cassette tapes of their popular western artists.This situation prevented many Igorots, most e specially, the young generation from taking some time to produce tunes, most especially during memorable or special events (Reyes cited in Craig & King, 2002). Since youngsters are bombarded with pre-packaged music, they no longer need to sustain extra effort in song making for all they have to do is purchase a copy of their favorite artists and push the play button.The problem with the consumerist entree of Americanization is that it forces indigenous cultures to believe that they actually need the cultural products that are being offered to them. Americanization tends to create false needs in order to serve the western interest. SinceConclusion Indeed, undoubtedly globalization and imperialism are the same. It subdues both the economic and cultural aspects of indigenous and non-western cultures by use the idea of progress and modernity as a disguise or as a defense.With the availability of sophisticated technology, globalization or imperialism spread much faster thus bringin g death to historical practices and customs. Globalization or imperialism also results to personal identity problems and further marginalization of ethnic groups. The consumer-driven get on have totally bastardized and transformed the cultural expression of indigenous groups into mere commodities that readily lack the artistry and intricacies of traditional works via standardization.ReferencesAllen, G Albala, K. and Nestle, M. (2007). The Business of Food. Westport, CT Greenwood create Inc.Andersen, R. and Gray, J. (2008). Battleground The Media. Westport, CT Greenwood issue Inc.Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon Multilingual Matters Ltd.Benshoff, H. and Griffin, S (2004). America on Film Representing Race, Class, sex and Sexuality at the Movies. Malden, USA Blackwell produceChristensen, D. and Levinson, D. (Eds). (2003). Encyclopedia of Community. California sharp-witted Publications Inc.Collier, P. (2007). The canful Billion. v ernal York Oxford University compaction Inc.Garson, G. (2006). Public study Technology and E-governance. Canada Jones and Bartlett PublishersGolding, P. and Harris, P. (1997). Beyond Cultural ImperialismHeld, D. and McGrew A. (2007). Globalization/ Anti-Globalization Beyond the Great Divide. Cambridge enactment foreshortenHersmondhalgh, D. (2002). The Cultural Industries. London Sage Publications Ltd.Horton, K. and Patapan, H. (2004). Globalisation and Equality. London RoutledgeInda, J. and Rosaldo, R. (2008). The Anthropology of Globalization. Malden, MA Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Janssens, R. 2004. Of Mice and Men American Imperialism and American Studies. Netherlands capital of The Netherlands University PressKaplan, R. and Baldouf, R. (1999). Language Planning in Malawi, Mozambique and the Philippines. Clevedon Multilingual Matters Ltd.Lockard, C. (1998). Dance of Life. USA University of hello PressMishkin, F. (2006). The Next Great Globalization. New Jersey Princeton Univ ersity PressMurray, W. (2006). Geographies of Globalization. New York RoutledgePearson, R. and Simpson, P. (2001). critical Dictionary of Film, Television and Theory. London RoutledgeReyes, M. (2002). Under Attack Mass Media Technology and autochthonal Musical Practices in the Philippines. In T. Craig, & R. King, (Eds.). Global goes Local Popular Culture in Asia (pp. 40-56). Hong Kong Hong Kong University Press.Sztompka, P. (1993). The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford Blackwell PublishersThomason, S. (2001). Language Contact An Introduction. Edinburgh Edinburgh University PressTomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and Culture. Chicago University of Chicago PressWasko, J. (2003). How Hollywood Works. London Sage Publications LtdWoodward, G. (2007). circle round Stage. Maryland Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.